Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J. appl. oral sci ; 28: e20200332, 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1134784

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objectives This randomized, split-mouth, single-blinded trial assessed whether the use of reservoirs in at-home bleaching trays is equivalent to non-reservoir trays. Our choice of an equivalence trial was based on the expectation that a non-reservoir tray is sufficient to produce a color change. Secondary outcomes such as tooth sensitivity (TS) and gingival irritation (GI) were also assessed. Methodology Forty-six patients were selected with canines shade A2 or darker. In half of the patient's arch, bleaching trays were made with reservoirs and the other half, without reservoirs. At-home bleaching was performed with carbamide peroxide (CP) 10% (3 h daily; 21 days). Color change was evaluated with a digital spectrophotometer (ΔE, ΔE00, and Whiteness Index) and shade guide units (ΔSGU) at baseline, during and one-month post-bleaching. TS and GI were assessed with a numeric scale (NRS) and a visual analog scale (VAS). Results After one month, the equivalence of reservoir and non-reservoir groups were observed in all color instruments (p>0.05). Fifteen and sixteen patients presented pain (absolute risk: 33% and 35%, 95%, confidence interval (CI) 21-46% and 23-49%) in the reservoir and non-reservoir side, respectively. The odds ratio for pain was 0.8 (95%CI 0.2-3.0) and the p-value was non-significant (p=1.0). TS intensity was similar between both groups in any of the pain scales (p>0.05). No difference in the GI was observed (p>0.05). Conclusions The protocol with reservoirs is equivalent in color change to the non-reservoir, although no superiority of the latter was observed in terms of reduced TS and GI with at-home 10% carbamide peroxide bleaching. Clinical Relevance The presence of reservoirs in a bleaching tray did not improve color change or affect tooth sensitivity and gingival irritation.


Subject(s)
Humans , Tooth Bleaching , Dentin Sensitivity , Tooth Bleaching Agents , Peroxides , Urea , Single-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome , Carbamide Peroxide , Hydrogen Peroxide
2.
Braz. dent. j ; 30(3): 285-294, May-June 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1011549

ABSTRACT

Abstract To answer the following focused question through a systematic review: "Are the risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity (TS) and bleaching efficacy different between adult patients who undergo at-home bleaching using trays with reservoirs and those who use trays without reservoirs?". A comprehensive search was performed in the MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature database, Brazilian Library in Dentistry, Cochrane Library, and grey literature without restrictions. Abstracts from conferences; unpublished and ongoing trial registries, dissertations and theses (ProQuest Dissertations and Periódicos Capes Theses databases) were searched. Only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included. We used the Risk of Bias tool (RoB) from the Cochrane Collaboration for quality assessment. After the removal of duplicates, title and abstract screening and full-text examination, nine RCTs remained for qualitative analyses. The great majority of the studies did not report the method of randomization, allocation concealment, and examiner blinding during color assessment. From the nine studies, eight were at unclear risk of bias. In regard to color change, four studies reported no change and two reported improved color change with reservoirs. Only four studies recorded tooth sensitivity and they reported no significant differences. Only one study reported greater gingival irritation with reservoirs. Lack of data reporting prevented us from running a meta-analysis. Further well-designed RCT should be conducted to answer this research question. So far there is not evidence to support that reservoirs in bleaching trays improve color change. PROSPERO - CRD42016037628


Resumo Para responder a seguinte questão de pesquisa através de uma revisão sistemática: "O risco e a intensidade de sensibilidade dentária (SD) e eficácia de clareamento são diferentes entre pacientes adultos que realizam clareamento caseiro usando moldeiras com reservatórios e aqueles que usam moldeiras sem reservatórios?". Uma pesquisa abrangente foi realizada no MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS), Biblioteca Cochrane e literatura cinzenta, sem restrições. Os resumos da conferência anual da Associação Internacional para Pesquisa Dental além de estudos registrados ou em andamento também foram pesquisados. Dissertações e Teses foram pesquisados utilizando o Capes Journal Dissertações e Teses ProQuest. Apenas ensaios clínicos randomizados (ECR) foram incluídos. Usamos a ferramenta Risk of Bias (RoB) da Cochrane para avaliação de qualidade. Após a remoção de duplicatas, triagem de título e resumo e exame de texto completo, nove ECRs permaneceram para análises qualitativas. A grande maioria dos estudos não relatou o método de randomização, ocultação de alocação e cegamento do examinador durante a avaliação de cores. Dos nove estudos, oito estavam sob risco claro de viés. Em relação à mudança de cor, quatro estudos não relataram nenhuma mudança e dois relataram melhora na mudança de cor com reservatórios. Apenas quatro estudos registraram a sensibilidade dentária e não relataram diferenças significativas. Apenas um estudo relatou maior irritação gengival com reservatórios. A falta de relatórios de dados nos impediu de executar uma meta-análise. Outros ECR bem desenhados devem ser conduzidos para responder a esta questão de pesquisa. Até agora não há evidências que sustentem que reservatórios em moldeiras de clareamento melhorem a mudança de cor. PROSPERO - CRD42016037628


Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Tooth Bleaching/adverse effects , Dentin Sensitivity , Brazil
3.
J. health sci. (Londrina) ; 21(1)30/04/2019.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-995951

ABSTRACT

O objetivo deste estudo clínico foi avaliar, por 7 semanas, a eficácia de dentifrícios clareadores e a satisfação dos pacientes após o uso. Foram selecionados 30 pacientes que possuíssem todos os dentes anteriores nas arcadas superior e inferior, apresentando cor inicial A2, avaliados através da escala de cores Vita Classical (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Alemanha). Os participantes foram aleatoriamente divididos em 3 grupos (n=10): GA - Colgate® Máxima Proteção Anticáries (controle negativo), GB - Colgate® Luminous White e GC - Colgate® Luminous White Advanced. Os dentifrícios foram distribuídos em bisnagas idênticas e aleatorizados. As avaliações de cor foram realizadas inicialmente ao uso (baseline), após 7, 15, 30 e 60 dias, utilizando dois métodos: avaliação subjetiva com as escalas de cor Vita Classical (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Alemanha) e Vita Bleachedguide 3D-MASTER (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Alemanha), e avaliação objetiva através do espectrofotômetro VITA Easyshade Compact®, Vident, Brea, CA, USA). Foi considerada a satisfação do paciente quanto a mudança de cor dos dentes. Os dados foram submetidos à análise estatística, utilizando análise de variância (ANOVA) de três critérios e pós-teste de Tukey (α=0.05). Os resultados demonstraram que houve diferença de cor estatisticamente significante nos grupos em que se utilizou os dentifrícios clareadores (GB e GC), nos períodos entre 15 e 30 dias. Conclui-se que ambos os dentifrícios GB e GC apresentaram ação clareadora, observado através das escalas subjetiva e objetiva. Porém, na percepção do paciente apenas no grupo GC houve mudança de cor. (AU).


The objective of this clinical study was to evaluate, for 7 weeks, the efficacy of whitening dentifrices and the patients' satisfaction after use. 30 patients were selected who had all the anterior teeth in the upper and lower arches, presenting an initial color A2, evaluated through the Vita Classical color scale (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany). The participants were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 10): GA - Colgate® Maximum Antibody Protection (Negative Control), GB - Colgate® Luminous White and GC - Colgate® Luminous White Advanced. The dentifrices were distributed in identical and randomized tubes. The color evaluations were performed at baseline after 7, 15, 30 and 60 days using two methods: subjective evaluation with the Vita Classical (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany) and Vita Bleachedguide 3D- MASTER (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany), and objective evaluation using VITA Easyshade Compact® spectrophotometer, Vident, Brea, CA, USA). The patient's satisfaction with the teeth color change was considered. The data were submitted to statistical analysis using ANOVA of three criteria and Tukey post-test (α = 0.05). The results showed that there was a statistically significant difference in color in the groups in which the whitening dentifrices were used (GB and GC), in periods between 15 and 30 days. It was concluded that both GB and CG dentifrices presented a whitening action, observed through the subjective and objective scales. However, in the perception of the patient only in the CG group there was a change of color. (AU).

4.
Rev. odontol. UNESP (Online) ; 45(1): 53-58, jan.-fev. 2016. tab, ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-774581

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Avaliar in vitro a capacidade de remoção de pigmentos ocasionados em resina composta após aplicação de peróxido de hidrogênio 35%. Material e método: Confeccionaram-se 20 amostras de resina composta Opallis (FGM), cor A1, em matriz metálica circular. As amostras foram divididas em quatro grupos (n=5) dos seguintes agentes corantes: água destilada (controle), café, vinho tinto e Coca-Cola®. No manchamento, as amostras ficaram imersas nas soluções durante 72 horas, com troca diária das bebidas. Procedeu-se à aplicação do gel de peróxido de hidrogênio 35% (Whiteness HP Blue Calcium, FGM) em três sessões, sendo uma aplicação do gel por sessão, o qual permaneceu nas amostras durante 40 minutos. Medidas de cor foram feitas inicialmente, após manchamento, após aplicação do peróxido e por mais 21 dias, usando espectrofotômetro Vita Easyshade. Os dados foram submetidos à análise de variância de dois fatores (tempo vs. corante) e ao teste de Tukey, para o contraste das médias (alfa=0,05). Resultado: Apresentaram alteração de cor (delta E - média/desvio padrão de L*) o café (15,7 ± 2,0) e o vinho (15,2 ± 4,6), quando comparados à Coca-Cola® (4,8 ± 1,9). O peróxido de hidrogênio removeu a pigmentação das amostras, porém, para nenhum dos corantes, houve retorno à coloração inicial, principalmente no grupo manchado por café (12,9 ± 1,5); este mostrou diferença significativa quando comparado ao controle (1,6 ± 0,6), diferentemente do vinho (3,3 ± 0,6) e da Coca-Cola® (2,1 ± 0,9), que se aproximaram do grupo controle. Conclusão: As soluções corantes pigmentaram a resina composta, principalmente o café. A aplicação do peróxido de hidrogênio 35% foi eficaz na remoção de pigmentos das amostras, porém, em nenhum dos grupos, com diferentes corantes, houve retorno à coloração inicial (p> 0,005).


Objective: Evaluate in vitro the ability to removal pigments of composite resin after application of hydrogen peroxide 35%. Material and method: Concocted to-20 resin samples composed Opallis (FGM), A1 color, in circular metal matrix. The samples were divided into 4 groups (n = 5) the following coloring agents: distilled water (control), coffee, red wine and Coca-Cola®. In the staining, the samples were immersed in the solutions for 72 hours, with daily change of beverages. Proceeded to the application of 35% hydrogen peroxide gel (Whiteness HP Blue Calcium, FGM) in 3 sessions, one application of gel per session that remained in the samples for 40 minutes. Color measurements were made initially after staining after application of the peroxide and for 21 days using Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer. The data were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (alfa = 0.05). Result: Significant color change was observed in specimens after immersion in the solutions, except the control group. Hydrogen peroxide was capable of removing the stains, however the color did not return to the baseline in any of the staining groups, especially for the groups immersed in coffee. Conclusion: Staining solutions can stain the composite resin. The application of 35% hydrogen peroxide can remove partially the staining, minimizing the color change produced by the staining solutions. However, the bleaching gel was not capable of removing all staining, especially for the coffee group.


Subject(s)
Spectrophotometry , In Vitro Techniques , Pigmentation , Analysis of Variance , Composite Resins , Hydrogen Peroxide , Tooth Bleaching , Wine , Beverages , Distilled Water , Coffee , Esthetics, Dental
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL